> 1) Currrently, correct formatting depends on their being an
> "issuance" element, particularly on the host. So for Ackley, can
> you add that? It should be monographic.
> I wasn't gettting the series level output, and I'm pretty sure
> that's why. Because citeproc defaults to article without the
> issuance, it looks at the wrong reftype.
You mean like this:
<publisher>U.S. Army Corps of Engineers[...]</publisher>
Will all records of genre book have issuance=monographic? What about
And should I also put a "originInfo/issuance/continuing" into the
<relatedItem type="series"> branch?
> 2) As I mentioned before (though it's minor), if you want citproc
> to handle details of initilazation, you need to output each initial
> to a separate namePart.
Yes, thanks for noting it again. I'm aware of the problem but haven't
found a solution to yet.